Much has changed concerning Off Page optimization. Back links are
actually now like playing with fire for the new or those with little
experience only time will prove me right. A recent Google announcement
involving some types of directory web 2.o linking was recorded to
actually prove more harm than good.
Verti Group International posted a video pointing to this discussion on their home page several weeks ago. You may want to take a look. I personally believe there has been a major shift involving On Page recently and the need to be selective in a mix of back-linking. I also believe that in many cases less is better (if you know what G is looking at). It is now how the dots are connected as well as timed. Don’t believe me… We control some of Seattle’s most competitive searches and are paid thousands (not hundreds) a month to know.
You can always Google this subject with Google’s spam expert Matt Cutts and I am confident you will find this out for yourself.
Of course… like us, you may want to start reading the Google Copyrights. It is widely known that I did not graduate high school. That makes me work all that much harder to be right.
Also, save your time… We don’t tag our clients for the same reason that we no longer as we did for years needed to be number one for SEO search terms. It is all about the client now. Do you really think we would make it that easy for search engines to find those paying to engineer rankings?
It’s time to change. The days of keyword EMD’s “exact match domains” and keyword stuffing is over. Thank Goodness for that.
Last, the cost of REAL SEO has risen 10 fold since I entered as the original and registered owner of the trademark “SEO Seattle”.
Good Luck with that back linking. We know that the only Off Page Optimization to hold will be those who “LINK SCULPT” and so much more. I guess I just am tired of staying quiet and wanted to date and record this statement for all to consider after the next year or so.
Google does make it easy to care for a client. Just read the G Webmaster Guidelines. G will always want a search to uncover the right and most valuable content. That said. I also know that SEO is no cookie cutter and there is a huge difference in one category and another. Not to mention the difference in geographic areas and the relationship to SERP’s. Enough said.
Source : http://vertigroupinternational.com/for-the-record/
Verti Group International posted a video pointing to this discussion on their home page several weeks ago. You may want to take a look. I personally believe there has been a major shift involving On Page recently and the need to be selective in a mix of back-linking. I also believe that in many cases less is better (if you know what G is looking at). It is now how the dots are connected as well as timed. Don’t believe me… We control some of Seattle’s most competitive searches and are paid thousands (not hundreds) a month to know.
You can always Google this subject with Google’s spam expert Matt Cutts and I am confident you will find this out for yourself.
Of course… like us, you may want to start reading the Google Copyrights. It is widely known that I did not graduate high school. That makes me work all that much harder to be right.
Also, save your time… We don’t tag our clients for the same reason that we no longer as we did for years needed to be number one for SEO search terms. It is all about the client now. Do you really think we would make it that easy for search engines to find those paying to engineer rankings?
It’s time to change. The days of keyword EMD’s “exact match domains” and keyword stuffing is over. Thank Goodness for that.
Last, the cost of REAL SEO has risen 10 fold since I entered as the original and registered owner of the trademark “SEO Seattle”.
Good Luck with that back linking. We know that the only Off Page Optimization to hold will be those who “LINK SCULPT” and so much more. I guess I just am tired of staying quiet and wanted to date and record this statement for all to consider after the next year or so.
Google does make it easy to care for a client. Just read the G Webmaster Guidelines. G will always want a search to uncover the right and most valuable content. That said. I also know that SEO is no cookie cutter and there is a huge difference in one category and another. Not to mention the difference in geographic areas and the relationship to SERP’s. Enough said.
Source : http://vertigroupinternational.com/for-the-record/
